The Betrayal of India’s Children: How Vote-Bank Politics Entrenched Medievalism
When India became independent in 1947, our leaders inherited a wounded, fragile nation. Partition had torn the land, displaced millions, and left Muslims within India anxious about survival. In such a moment, our Constitution-makers faced a profound choice: should all citizens be guaranteed the same dignity in family law, or should communities retain their separate “personal laws”? They chose pluralism over uniformity. Hindu law was codified and reformed in the 1950s - polygamy was abolished, inheritance was modernized, minimum marriage ages were fixed. But Muslim law was left untouched, on the grounds that it was “too sensitive.” Article 44 of the Constitution promised a future Uniform Civil Code, but only as an aspiration. That “later” never came. And it is here that lies the great betrayal. The Vote Bank Trap In the decades after Partition, India’s political class found it easier to treat Muslims not as citizens but as a vote bank. Once the educated elite had migrated to Paki...